Commentary: Avoid boatload of compliance pain

U.S. exporters should become aware of the potential far-reaching impacts of the latest OFAC sanctions against Russian shipyards.

Commentary: Avoid boatload of compliance pain

U.S. exporters should become aware of the potential far-reaching impacts of the latest OFAC sanctions against Russian shipyards.

Commentary: Avoid boatload of compliance pain

U.S. exporters should become aware of the potential far-reaching impacts of the latest OFAC sanctions against Russian shipyards.

 

   U.S. exporters of technologies used in the construction of ships overseas should gain a clear understanding of the potential impacts from the latest round of Treasury Department sanctions imposed on a handful of Russian companies located in the Black Sea region.
    Last week, Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added Yaroslavsky Shipbuilding Plant, Zelenodolsk Shipyard Plant, AO Kontsern Okeanpribor, PAO Zvezda, AO Zavod Fiolent and GUP RK KTB Sudokompozit to its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List.
    These designations block all property and interests in property of those individuals and entities, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from transacting with them. Any entities with an owned aggregate of 50 percent or more by these designated persons also are blocked.
    The companies were added to SDN List for their alleged role in supporting Russia’s recent attacks against the Ukraine navy in the Kerch Strait.

   While it might be easy for a U.S. exporter to avoid any future business with these newly sanctioned shipyard operators, they may not realize just how deep the financial tentacles of these companies may reach globally to other shipyards outside Russia. Any entities with an owned aggregate of 50 percent or more by those designated companies and individuals are also blocked.
    Shipyard technology and equipment suppliers quickly discovered this in 2014 when United Shipbuilding Corp., which designs and constructs ships for the Russian navy and is the largest shipbuilding company in Russia. The company also has financial interests in shipyards outside Russia, including a 100 percent ownership in Finnish passenger vessel builder Arctech Helsinki Shipyard.
    Not doing one’s detailed homework on the financial holdings of overseas shipyards prior to exporting could lead to a boatload of U.S. compliance headaches and penalties.

[Air] cargo is in the doldrums with smaller volumes being shipped over the last four months than a year ago. And with order books weakening, consumer confidence deteriorating and trade tensions hanging over the industry, it is difficult to see an early turnaround. 

The Port of Baltimore handled a port-record 43 million tons of international cargo in 2018, eclipsing the previous mark set in 1974.

Most Popular
Latest News
Social Media

Loading...

USTR undertaking 2019 GSP review

USTR undertaking 2019 GSP review

Embed this story

Share Code Version 1

This version will embed the story headline and includes HTML fallback protection, ensuring the story will display even if some users decide to disable javascript in their browsers.

Copy & Paste the following code to embed this story on your website:

Preview

Commentary: Avoid boatload of compliance pain

U.S. exporters should become aware of the potential far-reaching impacts of the latest OFAC sanctions against Russian shipyards.

Mar 20, 2019 on Dec 27, 2018AmericanShipper.com

Share Code Version 2

This version will embed the story headline without any styling applied. Use this version if you will use your own custom styling on your website. This version also includes HTML fallback protection.

Copy & Paste the following code to embed this story on your website:

Preview

Commentary: Avoid boatload of compliance pain

U.S. exporters should become aware of the potential far-reaching impacts of the latest OFAC sanctions against Russian shipyards.

Mar 20, 2019 on Dec 27, 2018AmericanShipper.com